Thursday, August 16, 2012
Exhibit Hall (Kansas City Convention Center)
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this presentation attendees will be able to:
- Recognize why they should establish positive media attention in news stories and editorials that put forward the positive aspects of tobacco control policies.
Audience:
This presentation is aimed at those focusing on evaluation and data gathering during the
process of working for a tobacco control policy.
Key Points:
A content analysis was conducted on 4,554 Missouri newspaper articles and editorials on
smoke-free policies published in 115 Missouri newspapers from August 2005 to December
2011. Smokers’ and non-smokers’ support for smoke-free bars and restaurants was
compared in the Campus-Community Alliances for Smoke-free Environments (CASE)
random digit dial phone survey. Editorials and newspaper coverage on tobacco control for
Missouri towns that adopted a policy were contrasted with survey results of smokers and
non-smokers in Missouri towns using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM). In this session, the presenters will explain the assessment of the newspaper coverage about
Missouri tobacco control policies on policy implementation, compared with survey results
on Missouri smokers' and non-smokers' support for smoke-free bars and restaurants, as
well as communities’ adoption of tobacco control legislation.
Educational Experience:
The audience will learn the process the presenters used to create, conduct and analyze the
survey and the content analysis. Additionally, the session will help explain the reasons for
comparing these two data sets and how that can be used to enhance a tobacco control
campaign.
Benefits:
Media attention on smoke-free policies can shape smokers’ and non-smokers' attitudes
toward smoke-free bars and restaurants, as well as communities’ adoption of tobacco
control legislation. Tobacco control advocates should aim to establish positive media
attention in news stories and editorials that put forward the positive aspects of tobacco
control policies.