346 Adoption, Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines

Thursday, August 16, 2012
Exhibit Hall (Kansas City Convention Center)
Nicole Kuiper, MPH , Office on Smoking and Health , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Stephanie H. Herbers, MPH, MSW , Center for Tobacco Policy Research, Washington University in St. Louis
Laura Bach, BA , Washington University, Center for Tobacco Policy Research
Dr. Douglas Luke, PhD , Center for Tobacco Policy Research, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
Martha Engstrom, MS , Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Gloria Bryan, PhD , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health

Learning Objectives

At the conclusion of this presentation attendees will be able to:

  1. 1. Describe the purpose of this multi-state evaluation 2. State the resources that states are most likely to consider high priority to their work 3. Discuss implications for EBG development, translation, and dissemination at both federal and state levels

Adoption, Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines

Audience:  Researchers/practitioners who use or produce evidence-based guidelines

Key Points: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released the Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs in 1999 and updated version in 2007, detailing the funding recommendations and structure of a comprehensive program.  CDC funded the National Association of Chronic Disease Directors to conduct a multi-year, multi-site evaluation on the use of Best Practices and other evidence based guidelines (EBGs). The Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Washington University (WU) partnered with CDC to conduct this evaluation. After gathering input from project officers at CDC, an external evaluation advisory group, and participants at conferences, WU team visited seven states and the District of Columbia. Interviews were conducted with lead agencies and partnering agencies to examine awareness, dissemination and implementation patterns of EBGs. Partnerships and networks were mapped and analyzed for communication, collaboration and discussion of the Best Practices. Participant awareness of EBGs varied by the type of agency they were from and type of guideline. Various factors influenced decision-making related to implementation of EBGs. Facilitators, challenges, and needs related to using EBGs were identified and will be discussed. Findings offer implications for EBG development, translation, and dissemination at both federal and state levels.

Educational Experience: lecture

Benefits:   Improvement of evidence-based practice